Sunday, September 28, 2008

2008 Uni Games Preview: Part 3

It's 9:30am on Sunday, and all the interstate folk are arriving in Melbourne and getting settled. The excitement is starting to reach fever pitch as we are less than 24 hours away from the first pull.

And I'm at bloody work.

Still, gives me time to go over my thoughts and predictions for the week ahead. In keeping with my ubernerdishness, I actually bothered to go through the draw and predict each head to head game. And these are the final standings I've come up with...

1. Sydney
2. Monash
3. Melbourne
4. Flinders
5. Latrobe
6. UWA
7. Newcastle
8. Macquarie
9. Adelaide
10. Ballarat
11. Murdoch
12. Griffith
13. UTS
14. QUT
15. ANU
16. RMIT
17. Edith Cowan
18. Deakin
19. Wollongong

A few notes...
  • - I don't think Deakin are a bad team as such, but with only 9 players they are going to run out of legs on Wednesday and will struggle to keep up with larger squads on Thursday and Friday.
  • - I have Newcastle and Macquarie down lower than most because my little model showed them facing Monash and Melbourne respectively in the quarter finals, and I think the hometown heroes will get up in both those instances.
  • - Also in my model, Adelaide would be very unlucky to not make quarters from Pool E. However if UTS beat them in Pool B, they'd have a better shot of a quarter final berth in Pool F. Hmm.
  • - I know a lot about some teams, and bits and pieces about others, but absolutely nothing about ANU this year. They might be semi final contenders for all I know.

Now the Green & Gold team is based on form at AUG, not any previous accolades. That being said, here's my prediction for the lineup (courtesy of Ultitalk.com)

  • Seb Barr (MON)
  • Alex Britten-Jones (AU)
  • Lu-Wee Koh (USYD)
  • Chris Lavis (NCLE)
  • Pete Liddicoat (USYD)
  • Lachlan McDonald (LTU)
  • Tarrant Meehan (MELB)
  • Joel Pillar (FU)
  • Owen Shepherd (MON)
  • Megan Gamble (MQU)
  • Sarah Hammer (USYD)
  • Isobel MacAuley (USYD)
  • Karen Palmer (AU)
  • Ellie Sparke (NCLE)
  • Jenica Villamor (LTU)
  • Erin Wallis (FU)
On top of that, selectors will be watching Liz Dodd (NCLE), Rian Dutch (AU), James Eley (UWA), Chris Freise (MELB), Chris Hill (NCLE), Dave Lockhart (LTU), Andy Moroney (MON), Michelle Phillips (MELB) and Carol Seeto (USYD) very closely.

MVP predictions - Jason Gibson (Deakin) and Bec Wallbridge (RMIT)

And my picks for the Martin Laird Award...Mike Tarn and Rosie Suthers.


I'll write a review if I remember any of it.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

2008 Uni Games Preview: Part 2

Today we look at the two other pools...


POOL C
Sydney (3), UWA (6), Ballarat (11), QUT (14), Wollongong (17)

This seems to be another pool with a clear frontrunner - Sydney. The size of Suufa's structure led to them being the only team that had to turn quality players away this year. They love to play a lot of zone D, and why not - they're good at it. They have the most depth of any team coming, but they have been known to succumb to brain explosions - insert AFL-style "mental toughness" cliche here. UWA seem to be a complete mystery to eastern states, but they had 5 of their players representing Sublime and Primal in Coffs this year, so UWA will know more about us then we'd probably like them to. They have a large squad and plenty of experience as a team, so they should wrap up 2nd place and may even take Sydney to a close game. QUT and Ballarat have both lost a lot of their top talent from 2007, so the team that settles into their rhythm first in their game on Monday morning should take third. As odd as it seems, the weather should be a huge factor in this pool - Ballarat will thrive in winter weather, but UWA and QUT will be more adapted to the conditions if Melbourne produces temperatures of 25° plus.

Prediction: Sydney 4-0, UWA 3-1, Ballarat 2-2, QUT 1-3, Wollongong 0-4

Game to watch: QUT vs Ballarat, 0830 Monday

Players to watch:
Lu Wee Koh (Suufa) - Plays as the chaser in Sydney's zone D. Is very quick and very smart on the mark, forcing teams to either move the disc quicker than they'd like to, or to take risks. Which is what you want a zone to do, I suppose.

James Eley (UWA) - Comes into AUG carrying a knee injury, but even at a reduced capacity should be a target player.

Amanda Eastwood (BUUF) - Is playing her final AUG and will be looking to wrap up a fourth consecutive BUUF MVP award. Will be on the end of a lot of deep throws. May be an outside chance at G&G selection, depending on where BUUF can finish.




POOL D
Newcastle (4), Melbourne (5), Murdoch (12), Griffith (13), RMIT (18)

If you had to pick a "pool of death" like you do in every tournament, this one is probably it. But really, that tag is only applied because there's two potential semi finalists in it - Newcastle and Melbourne. Moho are still hurting after last year's Pool A points difference debacle, so they'll be gunning to improve upon 2006's bronze. Having four current Australian representatives doesn't hurt, either. Newcastle have a squad loaded with talent, but are missing Dave Jarrott who was their lynch pin at ECC. Chris Lavis has plenty of support, but it will be interesting to see if they can hold it all together for five days. And once again, the battle is on for 3rd. Murdoch are missing Andrew Hutcheon, who was the key player in their last 3 AUG outings, so will probably be adjusting to a new style. The G-Unit are also missing their key guy Stefan Rappazzo, but have a lot of athletic folk who may give a lot of teams a solid runaround. RMIT shouldn't be discounted, and certainly have the potential to upset Murdoch or Griffith. In fact, that's what I'm tipping.

Prediction: Melbourne 4-0, Newcastle 3-1, Griffith 1-3, Murdoch 1-3, RMIT 1-3

Game to watch: Newcastle vs Melbourne, Monday 1030

Players to watch:
Tarrant Meehan (Moho) - This is what junior development does. It produces players who are two-time Australian reps and two-time Nationals players that are in their first year of university. Taz is freakish. That's all there is to it.

Chris Hill (Newcastle) - "Chilly" has a lot of raw talent, and can punt a forehand further than most players I have seen. Will probably act as a target for Chris Lavis and Liz Dodd to throw at.

Bec Walbridge (RMIT) - Bec still rates herself as a novice in women's ultimate, but a season of experience in the single gender game can do wonders for a uni player. Will get more confident as the week goes on, and may be up for MVP on Friday.


Full predictions to be posted tomorrow morning.

Friday, September 26, 2008

2008 Uni Games Preview: Part 1

It's probably about time I did this.

On Monday, 19 teams will descend on the at-times-questionable fields of Albert Park for the 2008 Australian University Games. It can be said that the competition is weaker than 2007, with many big name players and big name teams missing, but I'd disagree with that. I think the quality competition will be a lot better, with more "teams" and less "bunch of people that are going to have the same institution name on their Bachelor of Arts degree". This year sees a welcome return to the reclassification (ie: normal) format, so teams that show consistency over the week will be rewarded.

Unless they're consistently terrible.


POOL A
Macquarie (1), Flinders (8), Latrobe (9), Edith Cowan (19)

There was a bit of discussion over whether Mac should get the #1 seed, since they have an almost entirely different line-up to the gold medal winning squad from last year. But as a wise man once said, "Seeding is not intended to be a predictor of results, per se. It is, rather, a reward and reflection for performance to that point." Both Flinders and Latrobe have remarkably stronger teams than last year. Flinders welcome back Joel Pillar and Erin Wallis, and Latrobe have some mystery imports plus Super Macca. With the top 3 going through, ECU have been very unfortunate to be landed in a pool with three high quality teams. Hopefully they can learn something from them and have a decent crack at success in Pool G. I wouldn't be surprised to see Fury and LaTuf top the pool, with Mac in 3rd.

Prediction: Flinders 3-0, Latrobe 2-1, Macquarie 1-2, Edith Cowan 0-3

Game to watch: Latrobe vs Flinders, 1030 Monday.

Players to watch:
Megan Gamble (Mac) - Will run most of the offense given her recent Worlds experience. Will be well supported by Tiger Webb and Neil Roxburgh, but should outclass any female marker.

Sean Lace (Fury) - Impressed many opponents last year, and now has a Nationals and Junior Worlds campaign under his belt. Will be able to mark high quality players, allowing Pillar and Alec Deslandes to run riot.

Lachlan McDonald (LaTuf) - It's Super Macca. Do I need to explain further?




POOL B
Monash (2), ANU (7), Adelaide (10), UTS (15), Deakin (16)

This pool should see a bit more competition for the top 3 spots. Monash are coming to win, and their practice matches against Ballarat and Deakin last weekend showed this. They benefitted from the leadership of Booboo from the sidelines last year, and they should do again with O-Shep on the field. A very well drilled team that has a plan for every situation. Adelaide are quite similar to Flinders with key players returning - Rian Dutch and Karen Palmer. They have a larger squad this year, but would do well to avoid the late-week burnout with only 5 women coming. These two should comfortably top the pool, with the real fight coming for the 3rd spot. UTS and Deakin have both shown remarkable improvement over the last 12 months and have been playing and training with the same core squad for that time. However they may let themselves down - UTS are all capable on O, but always seem to play into the defence. They can never seem to break free and let their offence dictate the pace of the game. Deakin have a small squad (9 players!), no aerial threats and lack solid leadership. Unfortunately I don't see ANU getting the 3rd spot, so it will be between UTS and Deakin. I'm going with UTS.

Prediction: Monash 4-0, Adelaide 3-1, UTS 2-2, Deakin 1-3, ANU 0-4

Game to watch: Deakin vs UTS, 1030 Monday

Players to watch:
Tom Rocks (UTS) - Is their "token Nationals player" but at the same time isn't their only go-to-guy. Should be playing upfield, but will almost certainly handle all week.

Karen Palmer (Adelaide) - One of the best female handlers in the uni scene. We'll probably see her playing axis most of the time in a quaterback-like role, much like Huy Vu used to back in the day. Should keep room in her bag for a G&G medal.

Jason Gibson (Deakin) - Controls all of Deakin's offensive play and has the throws to pull that off.



Part 2 comes tomorrow.

Friday, September 19, 2008

"Tattoos and Santa Cruz: A Lesson In Diplomacy" by Dan and Timill

So Dan and Timill are over in the States at the moment, doing some travelling and ultimate following their Worlds duties. Got this email a while back from the boys, and wanted to share it with you. It's presented here in full, save for a bit of editing for readability. Enjoy.


"The very first night Timill and I arrived in Seattle from Canada we went out to a pub called Dantes. We met a bunch of people that Miranda and Idaho knew while we were out. One of the people we met was a guy called Reid. I knew he didn't play for Sockeye and I didn't know quite where this Reid fitted into the Seattle frisbee scene. A group of 5 or so of us got talking about Kaimana and Timill and I were trying hard to get Idaho and Nate The Great to commit to playing HoS instead of Sockeye. Nate was a little unsure he would have any time or money to come. Reid piped in and said, "I'm in for sure."

We didn't know this guy very well and thought he was a little weird, probably like the main admin guy of your uni team. Timill and I looked at each other and changed the topic because we didn't think he was any good. We started to talk about college ultimate, our friend Cyle was telling us how college ultimate meant a lot more to people here than any other division. We told him that university ultimate was mixed and didn't mean anything in Australia. And Reid said "Well it's serious over here, people even get tattoos for there college teams here." We asked him if he had a tattoo for his college team and he smiled and said yes. Reid used to go to the University of Western Washington and he played for their team Dirt. So i asked Reid what year Dirt had won Nationals.

He told us that his team had never qualified while he was there.

Timill and I lost our shit. All i could think about was Pissy getting a BUUF tattoo or Reevesy getting a Badgers tat. As we laughed he started to pipe, "We're a good team and if we were in any other region we would have qualified for Nationals". Waving our fingers around counting him out a pfeiffer and yelling, "Oooh piping," was hilarious. Reid said, "Fuck you guys I'm not coming to Kaimana with you anymore" and returned to his beer. And we thought well that was amusing - "I can't believe average players care enough to get a tattoo over here. We'll probably never see this guy again."

Three weeks later, while I was on the sidelines in Santa Cruz i got thinking, "Gee I'd like to play a couple tournaments during the series over here," and I spoke to a couple of Sockeye guys about Voodoo - the second team in Seattle - and what they thought my odds were of getting a game. "Oh it's sweet, we know the captains they'll take you for sure." Voodoo seems to have acted as the main feeder for Sockeye for the past few years, with Nate Castine, Sam Harkness and Aly Lenon all making it through to Sockeye via Voodoo. Voodoo are a pretty good team but it's unlikely they'll make it out of NW as there are three bids to nationals in a region dominated by Furious, Sockeye, Jam and Revolver.

I thought, "Well it sounds like fun to play Sectionals and Regionals," and I only have to stay around one extra week to play both. So i went over to Sockeye and asked for the captain of Voodoo's number, and of course they said:

"So his name is Reid, and this is his number...."

"...Oh shit."

So over the past four days I have worked some massive harry and have not talked about tattoos at all. Reid ended up inviting me to tryout last thursday night at a practice dominated by throwing drills... and I ended up making the team.

I'm quite unfit after eating fast food and drinking beer for four weeks post-Worlds but I'm excited to have the opportunity now, despite how hard I may have made it for myself.

Sectionals is next weekend and Regionals is a couple of weeks after that. Oh and by the way, Idaho thinks there is a gap going to open for a D handler on Sockeye next year and he is tipping Reid to break into the team.

Didn't tolkien it at all."


Glossary
pfeiffer - continually reacting to antagonisaiton.
harry - sweet talking
tolkien - read the situation

Thursday, September 18, 2008

The background of the Martin Laird Award

Since most of my readers are into the uni ultimate scene, you all should be familiar with the Martin Laird Award. If you're not, get over the to website and have a read. It should be fairly obvious to most that the idea came from the Callahan Award from the US college scene, and it's an idea I've had for a while.

It started out as a 'cut-and-paste' of the Callahan Award, but as I went through it trying to apply it to an Australian context, I found there were simply too many differences between the US and Australia for it to work. When they make the movie of my life, they'll insert the scene of the wastepaper basket piling up with rejected ideas right here. I started from scratch - who exactly did we want this award to recognise?

At AUG, there are two individual merits that a player can achieve - MVP and Green & Gold selection. As far as I know, there's no MVP award in other sports, but all of the others have G&G merit teams. I've felt that the MVP format used in ultimate doesn't necessarily find the best player at a tournament - there's a saying going around that to win MVP you have to be "the best player on a shit team." Unlike typical MVP awards where the votes are shared between the two teams, each gets their own set of votes that the opposition awards, so a standout player is always going to attract attention and votes.

But on the other hand, I have different fingers. Look at the literal meaning of the words Most Valuable Player - a Nationals player is highly valuable to a lower ranked team.

At SUG in 2005, we actually had to give 3-2-1 for guys and girls, but from both teams. At the end of the game, the two captains sat down and discussed who the best players were. This was...well, quite awkward. Trying to find a way to say that your best player was better than their best player without being a dick about it was quite difficult. In the end the case was usually 3 votes to the best player from the winning team, 2 votes to the best player from the losing team, and 1 vote to...someone else.

With the Green & Gold team, it is selected by non-players (usually coaches) so it takes care of that impartiality business. However there is always a bias towards the top 8 teams. From 2005 to 2007, only three players whose teams finished outside the top 8 made G&G - Chris Freise (Melbourne, 07), Mike Neild (QUT, 05) and Beth Rougier (QUT, 05). Even then, those teams finished 9th. There's any number of reasons why this is - the selectors tend to watch the higher ranked teams, and they may already have an idea of the players to watch for.

But I digress.

The idea of the MLA is to give recognition to the players who would otherwise get overlooked by the MVP and G&G processes. I also wanted put a focus on recruitment and development. Some teams put more effort into finding new players than others, and the "elite" players (ie: Nationals and Worlds players) already have a chance to get recognised with MVP and G&G, so they've been ruled out of contention.

I went to the Universities Committee and AFDA board with the idea, looking for feedback. The response was pretty much the same - we need to recognise the volunteers. And I thought, "Shit, why didn't I think of that?" It's quite difficult to display your volunteering prowess at AUG, so I tweaked the nomination process. Rather than simply submitting a name, clubs would also have to give a short write-up on why they are being nominated. A lot of grassroots volunteering often goes unnoticed, so the intent was to have their efforts highlighted, and that being nominated by their club for the award was an honour in itself.

The reaction of more than one person is that this is a glorified rookie-of-the-year award. That was never the intention. A couple of nominees have been playing for over two years. As I've written about before, there is a high crossover between AUG and Nationals/Mixed Nationals players, which rules a lot of players out of contention. Last year, 155 players were eligible for the award. That number will be bigger this year. The 111 players who played AUG and a Nationals last year will continue to play with their clubs after they graduate, so in a few years the trend will be uni players playing on Regionals teams rather than Nationals teams because, simply put, there's no room in Nationals for everyone. By 2011, the MLA will be recognising the best uni players in Australia. There'll only be a handful of chumps still doing the Nats/AUG double.


I've been very impressed with the stories nominees so far. I don't want to go endorsing any candidates just yet, but I do have my thoughts on who I would like to see win. Judging by the nominees that I know personally, I think we've got the aims and the process right so far because and all of them would be worthy winners. I really look forward to meeting the other nominees at AUG, and hope that they all go on to be club leaders in 2009 and 2010.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

NUFL: our neglected bastard step-child

Four or so years ago, some dude had a vision. A vision where the best ultimate teams in Australia would compete in a league across two or three or four weekends. That vision became NUFL - National Ultimate Frisbee League. It was where our best could compete to improve their abilites at the elite level, and play an important part in the selection of our National teams.

Fast forward to 2008, and NUFL seemed to be pushed to the side a bit. After the "dustbowl" fiasco of NUFL 2 in Melbourne last year, and the trouble NUFL 1 had with rain delays this year, NUFL 2 didn't even happen because, it seemed, no one really cared that much.

The problem at the moment is that it doesn't seem to fit anywhere in the ultimate calendar. You've got club trainings/tryouts in January to February, Regionals/Nationals in March to April, Uni season from May to September, Mixed season from July to October, and "hat" season November to December. The aims of the program also seem to be a little misguided. Initially it was started in the wake of 2004 Worlds after the powers that be identified a need for regular elite competition in preparation for 2006 WUCC and 2008 Worlds. But now 2008 Worlds has been run and won, what now for NUFL? Do we start looking to 2012 now?

I reckon NUFL needs a bit of a revamp.

First off, the aim of the competition. Yes, we need to emphasise the importance of regular elite competition for our top players. But NUFL is also the perfect vehicle to showcase our sport. It should be our "traveling circus" so to speak. Have three events per year around the country, with points counting towards a place in the final at NUFL 3. Push this form of our sport out to the media and spectators - "come and see the best of the best!" And at each event, have the local league coordinators and team captains going amongst the crowd - "come and learn to play like these guys!"

Second, the timing. While ultimate is played year-round, it is ideally a summer sport. Rather than have our elite competition in the middle of winter, we should be playing it in November, December and January. Right when the warmer weather is at its best, when the fields aren't taken up by rugby, soccer and AFL, and when the folks are going to come outside and watch.

So, in keeping with the "vision" theme, allow me to present my vision of what NUFL should be like...

The locations

The obvious answer to "where" is Sydney since that's where most players are. But I'd like to see it as our travelling roadshow - have a NUFL event as a major event "package" that we can sell to local councils. We tell the councils "give us somewhere to play and stay, and we'll bring the event". You would be amazed at how many smaller councils would jump at an opportunity like this - fields would be free, we could find local sponsors to help for catering, and we could get bulk discounts on accomodation. We could even tie it in to existing events - have a NUFL event played on Austar Arena on the same weekend as the Ballarat Show in November, or even down at the Peanut Farm Reserve during the St Kilda Festival in early February. The crowds are already there.


The teams

There's two routes we could go with this - have the top 6 open and top 4 women's Australian clubs from Nationals be invited to NUFL. So a hypothetical 2008/2009 NUFL would have Fakulti, Fyshwick United, I-Beam, Heads Of State, Chilly and Taipans or Sublime in the open, and Wildcard, Southside, Factory Girls and Team Box for the women. However, as I've previously stated, I have a problem with the marketability of existing team names. Plus we'd be leaving out talented interstate players. So here's the system I'd propose.

- Have existing groups "bid" for a team. For example, Chilly's leaders might bid for a Victorian team, while QUDA might bid for a Queensland team.
- Teams then pick X amount of players from their region, followed by interstate players via a draft.

"But that's exactly what NUFL already does!" I hear you cry. Not so fast, I say. We would have to emphasise the new entities having a seperate identity from their clubs, and having them identify with a geographical region. This would be specifically aimed at spectators, sponsors and local media. People are more likely to stick with a sport if there's a team or athlete they can identify with and support, and the easiest way to give them that is by having teams named for the states or cities they are from. At a NUFL event in Geelong, spectators are going to be instantly drawn to a team called Victoria Vikings, rather than a team called Team Box or Firestorm or whatever. After they've seen the Vikings play at NUFL 1 in November, they'll click onto the website in December and January to see how they went at NUFL 2 and NUFL 3.


The atmosphere

At risk of being accused of "selling out", we would have to make the events very spectator-friendly. We'd want it to be a day out for them - heaps of space between fields to allow people to set up deckchairs and picnic rugs, scoreboards on both sides, food and drink vendors, people distributing magazines with player names and photos, big noticeboards with fixtures and current league standings. I would think ground announcers would be a must - for things such as "goal caught by Player X with the assist from Player Y", and "foul called by Team A, contested by Team B, so the disc will go back to Player Z to restart play."

I let my imagination run wild a bit - corporate marquees, elevated above the fields a bit for a better view, for sponsors and the like. Live DJs playing sets between games. Team mascots. NUFL merchandise (official discs and Gaia shirts). Photos and video highlights posted on the website. A sideline bar on one field, like WUCC and Worlds.


Let's keep Nationals for the players, and take NUFL to the world.

Sunday, September 7, 2008

The psychological damage of injuries

Currently, I'm injured. Big news. Radiohead wrote a song about it.

But this injury is different. I actually like this injury. Because it's a normal injury sustained through normal means. A slight hamstring strain sustained at training last Monday got aggrivated on Tuesday night when I jumped to attempt to D a huck. Tried to play through it, but lasted approximately two minutes. Advice from AUG trainer: take it easy, apply RICE for 48 hours and see a doctor or physio. Advice from doctor: keep off it over the weekend, do some stretches and only train lightly this week. It feels ok now to walk on, but we'll see how I pull up after training tomorrow night. I'm not terribly worried about it at all.

Why not? Have a look at my semi-major to major injury history over the last couple of years...

April 2004
Injury: Dislocated patella. Cause: air guitar to this song on a wet dance floor. Down time: 12 months following surgery.

September 2005

Injury: Jarred knee, followed by severe swelling preventing normal joint function. Cause: same again, but I think it was this song instead. Down time: 1.5 days during AUG.

November 2006
Injury: Skin infection. Cause: blistering from a combination of new knee braces and hot weather. Down time: 0.5 days during WUCC.

November 2006
Injury: Jarred thumb. Cause: mistimed high five. Down time: 2 weeks following WUCC.

July 2007

Injury: bruised pelvis. Cause: crashing a stolen bicycle. Down time: 2.5 weeks.

September 2007

Injury: Dehydration plus sodium and potassium deficiency. Cause: failure to replenish fluid and nutrients lost during previous day. Real cause: alcohol abuse during the previous night. Down time: 1.5 days during AUG.


So it was refreshing to be able to go to my doctor and not have him laugh at me. However I did have quite a dark moment with this injury on Tuesday night. I got home from the hour long drive limping like a war veteran, but adamant that "I'll be fine by the morning." But when I went to walk upstairs to bed, it felt like someone had stabbed me in the leg with a star picket. I went down like I'd been shot and threw a few f-bombs about the place. I had one thought - "Shit...what if I can't play AUG?"

Turns out I'll be fine, but that dark thought ate away at me that night and I barely slept. I got reminded of it today while watching Geelong versus St Kilda, and seeing Brent Prismall go down with what is almost certainly a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament. As he was getting stretchered from the field, the look on his face told the story - he wasn't in pain from the knee, he was gutted that he will miss the chance to play in a premiership side.

For elite athletes sustaining a season, or even career, threatening injury, the psychological damage must surely be almost as devastating as the physical damage. Fortunately, they will almost always have access to a sports psychologist who can help them with such matters. But what about the amateur athletes? They will almost certainly turn to team mates to help them through, but they won't necessarily be the ones to reach out for help.

I suppose what we can do as ultimate players for friends with long term injuries is to keep them in the loop - let them know how the team is doing and let them know that they are being missed. Gives them that extra motivational factor to help them in their recovery and rehabilitation.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Ultimate at the Olympics: The common misconceptions

Every now and then I get an invitation on Facebook from a fellow ultimate player. The invitation is to join a cause or group or whatever else to help ultimate become an Olympic sport. It's all well and nice to have 100,000 people supporting the cause or whatever, but because I am a massive nerd, I thought I'd read up on what it would actually take for ultimate to become an Olympic sport. And, at risk of you not reading the rest of this post, I'll state the number one stumbling block we currently face.

There is no drug-testing in ultimate.

That's it. That is the biggest obstacle between now and Furious George wearing Olympic gold in 2016 is the complete lack of drug tested in or out of competitive ultimate. And possibly Sockeye. The IOC has a list of Recognised International Federations, and WFDF is not on it. To be recognised as an International Federation by the IOC, "must apply the Olympic Movement Anti-Doping Code and conduct effective out-of-competition tests in accordance with the established rules" (source). Now I'm sure the WFDF and UPA and AFDA and whoever else are not opposed to the World Anti-Doping Authority's principles and regulations, but the implementation of a drug testing process is difficult and costly. And don't even think about out-of-season testing.

But that's not the only thing stopping us.


There's no room

In 2002, the IOC ruled that future Summer Olympics would be limited to 28 sports, 301 events and 10,500 athletes [citation needed]. It took them a little over 6 years to break these self-imposed limits (Beijing had 302 events and 11,028 athletes). Baseball and softball have already been canned for the 2012 Olympics probably because of lack of interest and support from the international federation, but for the far more likely reason of those sports being quite shit. 2012 will go ahead without any replacements (26 sports, 300 events), but there are seven sports on the agenda to be added for 2016.


It's a team sport

The Ancient Olympics were all about individual pursuits - who could run the fastest, jump the highest and throw the furtherest. The modern Olympics like to replicate the ideals of the ancient Olympics, except these days there's women competing, and no one is naked. If you look at the list of 26 sports for 2012, there's only 8 strictly team sports. I'm not counting the likes of rowing, tennis and sailing because they have individual events as well as team events. With the IOC looking to reduce the number of total competitors at the Olympics, they are going to heavily favor the addition of individual sports rather than team sports.


It's not actually that popular

On the grand scheme of things, ultimate isn't very popular. In Australia, when you look at the number of registered players, we rank somewhere around canoeing. In the US, depending on who you listen to there's anywhere between 100,000 and 500,000 players, but there are only around 30,000 registered with the UPA. The requirements for ultimate to be considered as an Olympic sport are...
  • That it is competed in by men in 75 countries across 4 continents.
  • That it is competed in by women in 40 countries across 3 continents.
  • All these countries have a national governing body hosting a regular national championship.
The WFDF only has 26 countries represented among their Regular Members. The US isn't one of them, and they have 17 Associate or Provisional Members. So we only fill one of the relevant criteria in 44 countries. 26 additional countries have an ultimate presence, but not a national association or championships. So there's a way to go there.


There's a bit of a queue formed

Next year, when the IOC Assembly goes down in Copenhagen, the IOC will consider the applications of seven sports for inclusion in the 2016 Olympics. Softball, baseball, golf, rugby, squash, karate and roller sports. Karate and squash are probably best placed, with golf also up there. Rugby 7s would be preferred over union as there are more countries that play, less infrastructure required and less athletes overall. I have no idea what roller sports entails exactly, but if it's anything like this, then sign me up.


For all my pessimism, there's actually some good signs that it may be included some day down the track...


It's not completely unknown to the IOC

IOC officials checked out the ultimate events at the 2005 World Games and were reportedly very impressed with the skills shown. Admittedly, this was a modified version of the game (6 v 6), but it's still a good sign. But the part that impressed them the most? The self-officiation.


It is very equal-opportunity friendly

Part of the Olympic charter states that competing in sport should not be restricted because of gender, race, religion or financial situation. One of the best things about ultimate is how cheap it is to play. And how inclusive any game can be.


It is relatively inexpensive to run

For many Olympic events, new facilities are required to be built. Or the host city builds a new facility just because they can. Sports such as beach volleyball, slalom canoe/kayak, rowing, equestrian and BMX require specific, or even purpose built facilities. Ultimate can easily use existing stadia.


I hope that all cleared things up for you. Any questions?